WHAT WE LIVE IS NOT WHAT WE TELL: TOWARD A RECONSTRUCTIVE PSYCHOLOGY OF MEMORY ?

Authors

  • Julia KOUTAICH Lycée Stanislas Cannes

Keywords:

memories, memory, cognitive psychology, fiability, reconstruction, subjectivity

Abstract

The Purpose of the study is to justify that human memory is not an exact reproduction of reality, but rather a reconstruction shaped by our experiences and personal perspective. The research methodology relies on documentary methods, including the analysis
of online articles, explanatory videos, and concrete examples. The scientific novelty lies in a critical re-examination of the traditional conception of memory. Moreover, this perspective questions the reliability of witnesses in judicial contexts and thus urges legal systems to exercise caution when using testimonies, going so far as to reconsider them considering more objective evidence. It also highlights the role of memory in shaping the collective narratives of an era. Conclusion. Our memories are not merely faithful recordings of the past, but stories we reconstruct and reinterpret over time. This flexibility allows memory to adapt to our emotions and personal growth, making it a living mechanism at the heart of our identity. Rather than reflecting exactly what happened, memories help us make sense of our experiences, understand who we are, and move forward in life.

Author Biography

Julia KOUTAICH, Lycée Stanislas Cannes

Lyceum Student

References

Croisile, B. (2009). Tout sur la mémoire. [En français] Santana, L. & Costa, M. (n.d.). The online Museum on Forgetting (Le musée en ligne de

l’oubli). Hermann Ebbinghaus Museum site. [En anglais]. Consulté le 25 juin 2025.

Axelrad, B. (2015). Faux souvenirs, Le cas de Paul Ingram. Site de Brigitte Axelrad. [En français] Mentorshow. (2023). Loftus et Palmer (1974) : Expérience d’accident de voiture. Mentorshow site. [En français]

NeuroLaunch editorial team. (2024). Reconstructive Memory in Psychology: Unveiling the Cognitive Process of Recollection (La mémoire reconstructive en psychologie : dévoiler le processus cognitif de remémoration). NeuroLaunch site. [En anglais] Nadel, L., & Hardt, O. (2010). Update on Memory Systems and Processes (Mise à jour sur les systèmes et processus de la mémoire). PubMed Central. [En anglais] Schacter, D. L., Guerin, S. A., & St. Jacques, P. L. (2022). Memory distortion: An adaptive perspective (Distorsion de la mémoire : une perspective adaptative). Trends in Cognitive

Sciences, 26(5), 406–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2022.02.001 [En anglais]

Bergström, Z. M., & Simons, J. S. (2021). The social construction of memory: Recent advances in the study of collective memory (La construction sociale de la mémoire : avancées récentes dans l’étude de la mémoire collective). Current Opinion in Psychology, 43, 101–106.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.06.004 [En anglais]

Hardt, O., & Nadel, L. (2020). Systems consolidation revisited: Memory integration and the hippocampus (Consolidation des systèmes revisitée : intégration de la mémoire et hippocampe). Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 63, 84–90.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2020.03.006 [En anglais]

Published

2025-08-27

How to Cite

KOUTAICH, J. (2025). WHAT WE LIVE IS NOT WHAT WE TELL: TOWARD A RECONSTRUCTIVE PSYCHOLOGY OF MEMORY ?. INNOVATIONS IN THE SCIENTIFIC, TECHNICAL AND SOCIAL ECOSYSTEMS, 1(11), 15–19. Retrieved from https://istse-jaeger.com/index.php/istse/article/view/84